In Defense of Anagorism

political economy in the non-market, non-state sector

← An IndieWeb Webring 🕸💍 →
mastodon friendica codeberg exercism oeis neocities

Reverse engineering is not a crime

The law has more respect for trade secrets than it should, and companies have come to feel entitled to them. I respect intellectual property (even though I see it as a fundamentally broken institution in need of a major overhaul) but I don’t consider trade secrets a legitimate form of intellectual property as I do copyrights, patents, and trademarks. Patents, in particular, require disclosure of what is being patented and how it works.

An Open Source Hardware (OSHW) logo proudly displayed on the silkscreen of a blank project PCB, the uSupply by EEVblog
An Open Source Hardware (OSHW) logo proudly displayed on the silkscreen of a blank project PCB, the uSupply by EEVblog (CC BY-SA 3.0)

If information about how technologies work is a secret, at some point society will devolve into a literal cargo cult. Reverse engineering, like deep linking, must not be a crime, or we are doomed to that fate.

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Write a response on your own website and include a link to this post. Then submit your response’s URL here. Your response may appear here after moderation. To update or remove it, edit or delete your original post and submit the same URL again. Learn more about Webmentions.