In your comment in the blog you’ve said that you disagreed with the explanation that was given. I guess you disagreed on that author’s point of view of what would be a better world for human being and his reasoning for it.

I’m struggling to grasp this topic and I’m wondering if you could write an article refuting his points of view that you find wrong. You have already said that it seems to be delusional to have “people take away things for free”. I don’t see that as delusional, by the way. It seems to me something just like some sort of ideal outcome. A regular guy from any developed country would find even suggesting that there could be less government or more equal distribution of wealth something delusional.

Anyway, I’m just trying to learn and would like to read more about it.