I liked your old tagline because it so perfectly described my own trajectory regarding markets. And “antilibertarian antistatism” is a bit opaque to me, but this explanation helps a lot with that.

I definitely see what you’re saying about the “gun to the head” framing of power: someone has power over you if and only if they can point a gun at you and order you to do something (or order someone else to do same). This confused my understanding of what coercion was for longer than it should have.

Also, what does NAP stand for?