Interesting take. I came around to anarchism from the statist-left (well I was originally a right-wing Evangelical who turned statist-left) myself, so I had a natural distrust of the market form initially. As of late, I’ve become far more open to the idea of markets as a facet of an anarchist society. What it was for me was getting past the “either/or” mindset. As left-wing market anarchists define it, the “freed market” includes interactions and exchanges both on and off the market and/or cash nexus. A more individualistic conception of exchange within a cash nexus can coincide with a more communal conception of shared land, resources, etc. These two things are not necessarily mutually exclusive. Plus, even for those whose philosophy is far more individualistic, their robust idea of competition seems to preclude many of the things social anarchists are wary of (reemergence of capitalism, etc). To them, without the state the large-scale corporations of modern capitalism would not be able to exist due to the state’s current subsidization of their diseconomies of scale. Anyhow, that’s just my two-cents.