Perhaps “obsolescence” or “obviation” would have been a better choice than “abolition.” I’m simply saying that if obviation of tooth and claw is an evolutionary step, it would make sense to view obviation of grub and hustle as a further evolutionary step.

Perhaps that is the problem with ancapism, it offers no freedom from politics. I would never suggest government as a means to non-scarcity, although I don’t equate utopianism with government, and I don’t use utopianism as a pejorative. I do regard utopian goals (including post-scarcity) as asymptotic goals. That is my one concession to Reality.

I’m not sure how you conclude that I envision a society of moral replicates. Is it something that goes hand-in-hand with post-scarcity, or with utopia? People often accuse me of utopianism, but I’d gladly settle for a world in which nice guys and gals finish second last.

I don’t know whether I would call you a right winger, but you seem to have at least a few right wing tendencies, such as using terms like “collective” and “utopia” as pejoratives. Together with the anticorporatist stuff, it probably averages out to middle of the road, which is certainly no moral defect.