Oh, but whether anagorism can survive freedom of choice is precisely what I was asking, in my own roundabout way. Anagorism has no quarrel with anyone and will peacefully coexist with anything. The question is whether it can remain true to its principles and not be sucked into something other than itself, or put another way, whether anagorism ‘can hold its own.’ I stand by referring to panarchy as pluralism rather than Freedom Of Choice Itself. The tone of much of panarchist rhetoric comes across to me as ‘let’s perform an experiment to demonstrate that only anarcho-capitalism is workable.’ Please forgive me if my impressions are mistaken.