To Zacqary:

You seem to be using “humans are naturally F” as equivalent to “a human would be F on its own without human interaction.” But by that definition, we’d be committed to saying “humans are naturally dead.” That suggests to me that “a human would be F on its own without human interaction” doesn’t adequately capture what “humans are naturally F means.”

After all, people often say (whether correctly or incorrectly) “humans are naturally social,” and they surely don’t mean “a human would be social on its own without human interaction.”