Per Michel Bauwens: For example, [commoners] could create enterprises that are not profit-maximisers, but cooperatives, or they could use the peer production license, which allows free usage of the commons only to other commoners and thereby creates a counter-economy.

This reads a little different to me from the agorist definition of counter-economy: the sum of all human action proscribed by the State. Note the assumption that there is no human action which is considered non-economic.

I prefer "equal footing" over the "level playing field metaphor" because, as an anagorist, I dream of the society that is less of a playing field; less of a game. Maybe I would be OK with the need to compete if the game weren't rigged, but I'm skeptical.

That proverb, "less is more, up to a point" should be added to the text for Nonzero Tolerance Policy. I'll do so when I get around tuit, of someone else hasn't by then. BTW, Google shows 4 instances of "nonzero tolerance policy". The one that I'm not responsible for is in Google Books, and is about microbiology, of all things.